PERG > Joe's Homepage 

1. The computer revolution in physics education? It's here! E. F. Redish, American Journal of Physics 91 (2023) 415. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0155772. 
2. Using the Maryland Biology Expectations Survey to assess the effects of different pedagogies and classroom contexts on student epistemology in an introductory biology course, K. Hall, D. Fripp, K. Chatzykriakidou, E. Redish, and T. Cooke. Submitted for peer review (2023) 
3. Group active engagements for facilitating principles-based learning in introductory organismal biology, T. Cooke, J. Jense, K. Carleton, K. Hall, H. Jardine, B. Kent, E. Redish, and J. Schultz. The American Biology Teacher, 85:6, 317–326, IssN 0002-7685, electronic IssN 1938-4211. 
4. Using math in physics - Overview, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher 59 (2021) 314-318. 
5. Using math in physics - 1. Dimensional analysis, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher 59 (2021) 397-400.
6. Using math in physics - 2. Estimation, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 59 (2021) 525-528.
7. Using math in physics - 3. Anchor equations, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 59 (2021) 599-604.
8. Using math in physics - 4. Toy models, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 59 (2021) 683-688. 
9. Using math in physics - 5. Functional dependence, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 60 (2022) 18-21.
10. Using math in physics - 6. Reading the physics in a graph, E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 61 (2023) 651-656. (arXiv preprint with Supplementary Materials)
11. Using math in physics - 7. Telling the story, E. F. Redish. The Physics Teacher 62 (2024) 5-11. (Supplementary Materials) https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0159037 
12. Examining course syllabi: Introductory physics for life sciences, Remy Dou, Raluca Teodorescu, Adrian Madsen, Edward F. Redish, and Mark Reeves Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020143 (2019) - Published 26 November 2019 
13. Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in Introductory Physics for Life Science, B. D. Geller, B. W. Dreyfus, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, and E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020142 (2019). 
14. Blending physical knowledge with mathematical form in physics problem solving, Mark Eichenlaub and Edward F. Redish, in Mathematics in Physics Education, G. Pospiech, M Michelins, & B. Eylon, eds. (Springer Verlag, 2019). (preprint, arXiv 1804.01639)
15. Analysing the Competency of Mathematical Modelling in Physics. In: Greczyło T., Dębowska E. (eds) Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 190. (2017, Springer, Cham). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_3 (free access to preprint through link)
16. Applying Conceptual Blending to Model Coordinated Use of Multiple Ontological Metaphors, B. W. Dreyfus, A. Gupta, and E. F. Redish, Int. J. Sci. Ed. 37:5-6 (2015) 812-838. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1025306 (free access to preprint)
17. Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology, E. F. Redish and E. Kuo, Science & Education, 24:5-6 (2015-03-14) 561-590. doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
18. Students' reasoning about high energy bonds and ATP: A vision of interdisciplinary education, B. W. Dreyfus, B. D. Geller, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, & E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev. ST Physics Education Research 10 (2014) 010115, 15 pages.  
19. Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context, B. W. Dreyfus, B. D. Geller, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, & E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev, ST-PER 10 (2014) 020108, 11 pages.
20. Oersted Lecture 2013: How should we think about how our students think? E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys., 82 (2014) 537-551: doi: 10.1119/1.4874260 
21. NEXUS/Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists, E. F. Redish, C. Bauer, K. L. Carleton, T. J. Cooke, M. Cooper, C. H. Crouch, B. W. Dreyfus, B. Geller, J. Giannini, J. Svoboda Gouvea, M. W. Klymkowsky, W. Losert, K. Moore, J. Presson, V. Sawtelle, K. V. Thompson, C. Turpen, & R. Zia, Am. J. Phys. 82:5 (2014) 368-377. doi: 10.1119/1.4870386
22. Chemical energy in an introductory physics course for the life sciences, B. W. Dreyfus, B. D. Geller, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, & E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys. 82:5 (2013) 403-411.
23. Entropy and spontaneity in an introductory physics course for life science students, B. D. Geller, B. W. Dreyfus, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, & E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys. 82:5 (2014) 394-402.
24. "Like dissolves like": Unpacking student reasoning about biochemical heuristics, B. D. Geller, B. W. Dreyfus, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, and E. F. Redish, PERC 2013 Proceedings (2014), pp. 157-160.
25. The role physics can play in a multi-disciplinary curriculum for non-physics scientists and engineers, E. F. Redish, V. Satwtelle, and C. Turpen, in European Journal of Science Education, Proceedings of the Conference FISER '14 - Frontiers in Mathematics and Science Education Research, Famagusta, Cyprus, 1-3 May, 2014.
26. Negative energies: Why interdisciplinary physics requires multiple ontologies, B. W. Dreyfus, B. D. Geller, J. Gouvea, V. Sawtelle, C. Turpen, & E. F. Redish,2013 PERC Proceedings [Portland, OR, July 17-18, 2013], edited by P. V. Engelhardt, A. D. Churukian, and D. L. Jones; p. 129-132 
27. Infusing quantitative approaches throughout the biological sciences curriculum, K. V. Thompson, T. J. Cooke, W. F. Fagan, D. Gulick, D Levy, K. C. Nelson, E. F. Redish, R. F. Smith, & J. Presson, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (2013) doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.812754. 
28. Reinventing physics for life science majors, D. C. Meredith and E. F. Redish, Physics Today, 66:7 (2013) 38-43. doi: 10.1063/PT.3.2046 (pdf) 
29. Learning Each Other's Ropes: Negotiating interdisciplinary authenticity, E. F. Redish and T. J. Cooke, Cell Biology Education - Life Science Education, 12 (June 3, 2013) 175-186. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0147. 
30. Students' Reasoning about interdisciplinarity, B. D. Geller, B. W. Dreyfus, V. Sawtelle, J. Svoboda, C. Turpen, and E. F. Redish, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Philadelphia, PA, July 2012, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 146-149, doi:10.1063/1.4789673.
31. Students' Interdisciplinary Reasoning about 'High Energy Bonds' and ATP , B. W. Dreyfus, B. D. Geller, V. Sawtelle, J. Svoboda, C. Turpen, and E. F. Redish, to be published in in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Philadelphia, PA, July 2012.
32. Examining the Positioning of Ideas in the Disciplines, V. Sawtelle, T.-R. Sikorski, C. Turpen, E.F. Redish,  in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Philadelphia, PA, July 2012, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513 (2013) 366-369.
33. The Role of Context and Culture in Teaching Physics: The implication of disciplinary differences, E. Redish, in Proceedings of the World Conference on Physics Education 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, M. Taşar, editor (Pegem Akademi, 2013) 1- 21.
34. Disciplinary Authenticity: Enriching the reform of introductory physics courses for life science students, J. Watkins, J. E. Coffey, E. F. Redish, and T. J. Cooke, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., Vol. 8 (Apr 2012), 010112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010112
35. Student Views of Macroscopic and Microscopic Energy in Physics and Biology, B. W. Dreyfus, E. F. Redish, and J. Watkins,  Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Omaha, NE, August 2011, AIP Conf. Proc. 1413, 179-182 (2012).
36. Epistemic complexity and the journeyman-expert transition, T. J. Bing and E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., Vol. 8 (Feb 2012), 010105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010105. 
37. Examining the Impact of Student Expectations on Undergraduate Biology Education Reform, K. L. Hall, J. E. Watkins, J. E. Coffey, T. J. Cooke, and E. F. Redish, AERA 2011 report.
38. Understanding How Students Use Physical Ideas in Introductory Biology Courses, J. Watkins, K. Hall, E. F. Redish, and T. J. Cooke, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Portland, OR, July 2010, AIP Conf. Proc. 1289 (2010) 333-336. 
39. Introducing Students to the Culture of Physics: Explicating elements of the hidden curriculum, E. F. Redish, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Portland, OR, July 2010, AIP Conf. Proc. 1289 (2010) 49-52. 
40. The Case for Dynamic Models of Learners' Ontologies in Physics, A. Gupta, D. Hammer, and E. F. Redish, J. of the Learning Sciences, 19:3, 285-321 (2010).
1. Slotta Response, JLS 20:1, 151-162 (2011).
2. Hammer, Gupta, Redish Response to Slotta, JLS 20:1, 163-168 (2011)
41. Making Meaning with Math in Physics: A Semantic Analysis, E. F. Redish and A. Gupta, Physics Community and Cooperation, Vol. 1 GIREP Conf. Proc., Leicester, UK, August 20, 2009, 244-260 (2010).
42. Using Math in Physics: Warrants and epistemological frames, E. F. Redish and T. J. Bing,  Physics Community and Cooperation, Vol. 2, GIREP Conf. Proc., Leicester, UK, August 20, 2009, part of a Symposium ed. Karam and Pospiech, 71-76 (2010).
43. Analyzing Problem Solving Using Math in Physics: Epistemological framing via warrants, T. J. Bing and E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev. STPER, 5, 020108 (2009). 15 pages
44. Reinventing College Physics for Biologists: Explicating an Epistemological Curriculum , E. F. Redish and D. Hammer, Am. J. Phys., 77, 629-642 (2009). [paper including supplementary appendix] doi: 10.1119/1.3119150
45. Making sense of the Legendre transformation, R. K.-P. Zia, E. F. Redish, and S. R. McKay, Am. J. Phys. 77, 614-622 (2009).
46. Looking Beyond Content: Skill development for engineers, E. F. Redish and K. A. Smith,  Journal of Engineering Education 97, 295-307 (July 2008).
47. Using warrants as a window to epistemic framing, T. J. Bing and E. F. Redish, Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Edmonton, AB, July 2008, AIP  Conf. Proc. 1064, 71-74 (2008).
48. Symbolic manipulators affect mathematical mindsets, T.J. Bing and E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys. 76, 418-424 (2008).
49. Coordination of Mathematical and Physics Resources by Physics Graduate Students, A. Gupta, E. F. Redish, and D. Hammer, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Greensboro, NC, July 2007, AIP Conf. Proc. 951, 104-107 (2008)
50. The Cognitive Blending of Mathematics and Physics Knowledge, T.J. Bing and E. F. Redish, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Syracuse, NY, August 2006, AIP Conf. Proc. 883, 26-29 (2007).
51. Elements of a Cognitive Model of Physics Problem Solving: Epistemic Games, J. Tuminaro and E. F. Redish, Phys. Rev. STPER, 3, 020101 (2007).
52. Knowledge Organization and Activation in Physics Problem Solving, M. Sabella and E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys. 75, 1017-1029 (2007).
53. Whither/Wither the Physics Textbook in an Active/Interactive Era?, thinkpiece based on poster presented at the NSF conference, Reconsidering the Textbook: A Workshop, Washington DC, May 24-26, 2006.
54. Model Analysis: Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning, Lei Bao and Edward F. Redish, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010103 (2006).
55. New Directions of Research on Undergraduate Physics Education, Edward F. Redish, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education, "Physics for All," Tokyo, Japan, August 14-17, 2006. 
56. Problem Solving and the Use of Math in Physics Courses, E. F. Redish, to be published in Proceedings of the Conference, World View on Physics Education in 2005: Focusing on Change, Delhi, August 21-26, 2005
57. Changing Student Ways of Knowing: What should our students learn in a physics class?, E. F. Redish, to be published in Proceedings of the Conference, World View on Physics Education in 2005: Focusing on Change, Delhi, August 21-26, 2005
58. Reverse Engineering the Solution of a "Simple" Physics Problem: Why learning physics is harder than it looks, E. F. Redish, R. E. Scherr, and J. Tuminaro, published in a slightly abbreviated version in The Physics Teacher, 44, 293-300 (May, 2006).
59. Newton's zeroth law: Learning from listening to our students, R. E. Scherr and E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher, 43, pp. 41-45 (2005).
60. Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves, Michael C. Wittmann, Richard N. Steinberg, and Edward F. Redish, The International Journal of Science Education 25(8) (2003) 991-1013
61. Twenty Questions for PER: How does it all fit together?, E. F. Redish & M. C. Wittmann, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, CA, August 2004, AIP Conf. Proc. 790 , 11-14 (2005).
62. Resources, framing, and transfer, D. Hammer, A. Elby, R. E. Scherr, & E. F. Redish, in , Transfer of Learning: Research and Perspectives, J. Mestre (ed. ) (Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 2004).
63. A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling student thinking, Edward F. Redish, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics, "Enrico Fermi" Course CLVI, Varenna, Italy, August 2003, E. F. Redish and M. Vicentini (eds.) (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004).
64. Understanding students poor performance on mathematical problem solving in physics, J. Tuminaro and E. F. Redish, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Madison, WI, August 2003, AIP Conf. Proc. 720 , 11-14 (2004)
65. Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves, Michael C. Wittmann, Richard N. Steinberg, and Edward F. Redish, The International Journal of Science Education 25(8) (2003) 991-1013
66. Investigating student understanding of quantum physics: Spontaneous models of conductivity, E. Redish, R. Steinberg, and M. Wittmann, American Journal of Physics, 70:3, pp. 218-226 (2002). (published version)
67. Understanding probabilistic interpretations of physical systems: A prerequisite to learning quantum physics, Lei Bao and Edward F. Redish, American Journal of Physics, 70:3, pp. 210-217 (2002).
68. Concentration Analysis: A Quantitative Assessment of Student States, Lei Bao and Edward F. Redish, Physics Education Research Supplement to the American Journal of Physics, 69, S45-S53 (July 2001).
69. Who needs to learn physics in the 21st century and why?, Edward F. Redish, plenary lecture, GIREP Conference Physics Teacher Education beyond 2000, Barcelona Spain, August 2000.
70. What can you learn from a (good) multiple choice exam?Lei Bao and Edward F. Redish, contributed paper, GIREP Conference Physics Teacher Education beyond 2000, Barcelona Spain, August 2000.
71. The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics, R. Steinberg, M. C. Wittmann, L. Bao, & E. F. Redish, in Research on Teaching and Learning Quantum Mechanics: Papers presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 1999 (1999) 41-44. 
72. Discipline based education research: The case of physics, J. of Applied Developmental Psychology 21:1 (2000) 85-96. 
73. Diagnosing student problems using the results and methods of physics education research, Edward F. Redish (19. August, 1999, International Conference of Physics Teachers and Educators, Guilin, People's Republic of China).
74. Resource Letter PER-1: Physics Education Research, Lillian C. McDermott and Edward F. Redish, The American Journal of Physics, 67, 755-767 (September, 1999).
75. Millikan Award Lecture (1998): Building a Science of Teaching Physics, Edward F. Redish, The American Journal of Physics, 67, 562-573 (July, 1999). 
76. Teaching physics: figuring out what works, Edward F. Redish and Richard N. Steinberg, Physics Today 52, 24-30 (January, 1999).
77. Making sense of how students make sense of mechanical waves, M. Wittmann, R. N. Steinberg, and E. F. Redish, The Physics Teacher 37, 15-21 (January 1999).
78. Student expectations in introductory physics, Edward F. Redish, Jeffery M. Saul, and Richard N. Steinberg, Am. J. Phys. 66, 212-224 (1998). (pdf version)
79. The Distribution and Change of Student Expectations in Introductory Physics, Edward F. Redish, Richard N. Steinberg, and Jeffery M. Saul, Invited poster, presented at The International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education (ICUPE), College Park, Maryland July 31-August 3, 1996, E. Redish and J. Rigden, Eds., AIP Conf. Proc. 399 (1996).
80. Mathematical Tutorials in Introductory Physics, Richard N. Steinberg, Michael C. Wittmann, and Edward F. Redish, Sample class, presented at The International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education (ICUPE), College Park, Maryland July 31-August 3, 1996. E. Redish and J. Rigden, Eds., AIP Conf. Proc. 399 (1996).
81. New Models of Physics Instruction Based on Physics Education Research, E. F. Redish, Vortraege, Deutsche Physikalishe Gesellschaft, Didaktik der Physik, 60. Physikertagung, K. H. Lotze, Ed., 51-65, Jena, Germany, (March 1996).
82. On the Effectiveness of Active-Engagement Microcomputer-Based Laboratories, E. F. Redish, J. M. Saul, and R. N. Steinberg , Am. J. Phys. 65, 45-54 (January 1997).
83. Implications of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics, E. F. Redish, Am. J. Phys., 62, 796-803 (1994).
84. Are Computers Appropriate for Teaching Physics?, E. F. Redish, Computers in Physics, 7, 613 (Nov/Dec 1993).
85. What Can a Physics Teacher Do with a Computer?, E. F. Redish, Conference on the Introductory Physics Course, Jack Wilson, Ed. (Wiley, NY, 1997) 47-60.
86. Student Programming in the Introductory Physics Course: M.U.P.P.E.T,, E. F. Redish, and J. M. Wilson, American Journal of Physics, 61, 222 (1993). (pdf version)
87. The CUPLE Project: A Hyper- and Multi-Media Approach to Restructuring Physics Education, E. F. Redish, J. M. Wilson, and C. K. McDaniel, in Sociomedia, p. 219, ed. E. Barrett, Cambridge: MIT Press (1992).
88. The Comprehensive Unified Physics Learning Environment: Part II. The basis for integrated studies,  J. M. Wilson and E. F. Redish, Computers in Physics 6 (May/June, 1992) 282-286. 
89. The comprehensive unified physics learning environment:  Part I. Background and system operation, J. M. Wilson and E. F. Redish, Computers in Physics 6 (March/April, 1992) 202-209. 
90. Curriculum reform in physics: The computer as vehicle,  EDUCOM Review 24:1 (Spring, 1989) 24-34.
91. From here to the future: The impact of the computer on college physics teaching, E. F. Redish, Academic Computing (Nov. 1988) 18. 
92. Using Computers in Teaching Physics, J. M. Wilson, and E. F. Redish, Physics Today, 42, 34 (January 1989).
93. The M.U.P.P.E.T. Manifesto, W. M. MacDonald, E. F. Redish, and J. M. Wilson, Computers in Physics 2, 23 (July/August 1988).
94. The Coming Revolution in Physics Instruction, in Calculus for a New Century: A pump, not a filter, Ed. Lynn Steen, A National Colloquium, October 28-29, 1987 (The Mathematical Association of America, 1988). Available at ERIC.

Back to Joe's Homepage